Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01072
Original file (PD2012 01072.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXX     BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army
CASE NUMBER: PD
1201072   SEPARATION DATE: 20021213
BOARD DATE: 20130108


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (13F/Fire Support Specialist [forward observer]), medically separated for painful motion-right shoulder (named Status post [s/p] distal clavicle excision times two). The CI first sought medical attention in June 2000 for his injured shoulder for which he received physical therapy at Fort Hood. In 2001, the CI re-aggravated the injury and had right shoulder arthroscopic Mumford surgery (distal clavicle excision) in October 2001. The surgery provided some relief; however, over the course of 5 months, he continued to have pain, and arthritic spurring was found on his X-rays. He underwent a repeat arthroscopic Mumford, but continued to have pain with rucking, overhead activities, wearing his TA50, push-ups and strenuous physical training, despite multiple trials of rest, physical profiling, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and physical therapy (PT). He was unable to do his job as a forward observer or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3 profile (131111) and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated his shoulder condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION : I continue to have shoulder and ankle problems and pain. My hearing is worsening. My current VA % is 30%. Army awarded me 0%. (sic)


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The unfitting right shoulder condition as requested for consideration meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, is addressed below. The other requested conditions [left ankle condition, hearing loss and tinnitus] are not within the Board’s purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.









RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20020924
VA (4 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20021214
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Painful motion-right shoulder 5099-5003 0% Distal clavicle fracture with acromioclavicular arthritis s/p surgery times two 5203 10% 20030402
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Chronic Instability, left ankle with degenerative joint disease 5003 10% 20030402
Tinnitus 6260 10% 20030411
0% X 1 / Not Service-Connected x 0 20030411
Combined: 0%
Combined: 30%
* VARD 20030521 also awarded 0% for bilateral hearing loss. VARD 20110428 continued each rating at the rates established by the 2003 award.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

DOS 20021213
Right Shoulder ROM
MEB ~3.5 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20020826)
VA C&P ~4 Mo. Post-Sep
(20030402)
Flexion (0-180⁰)
150⁰no ROM deficiencies”
Abduction (0-180⁰)
140⁰
External rotation (0-90⁰)
60⁰
Internal rotation (0-90⁰)
To T7
Comments: 2 nd surgery 11 Mo. Pre-Sep
Contralateral arm is the same except for internal rotation to T5; O'Brien's test is mildly (+) [labral or AC jt] motor sensory and neuro exams normal (see text) Prominent dorsal AC joint; tenderness w/ overhead activities, but manifests no ROM deficiencies; increasing symptoms w/ crossed body adduction; impingement & supraspinatus maneuvers are (-)
§4.71a Rating
10% (PEB 0%) 10%
invalid font number 31502
The CI is right hand dominant. At the MEB exam, the CI reported continued pain and functional limitations following healing of his two surgeries for clavicle fracture and resections. The narrative summary noted the CI “continued to have pain with rucking and continuous overhead activities including wearing his TA50 and rucksack. In addition, long runs at higher paces would irritate his shoulder. The MEB physical exam noted the right shoulder ROM to be decreased but equal to the left, with the exception of internal rotation limited to T7 on the right compared with T5 on the left. Muscle strength was full. There was no shoulder instability. Pain was noted at the AC joint with some arm movements. The examiner stated doing push-ups exacerbated CI’s shoulder pain. Radiographs indicated post-surgical findings with no osteophytes. The MEB DD Form 2808 noted “R shoulder fracture/nonunion.” PT treatment notes indicated pain with overhead use. Prior radiographs indicated degenerative joint disease (DJD). The MEB diagnosis was s/p Mumford distal clavicle excision times two.

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam 4 months after separation, the CI reported similar complaints of pain to palpation of the AC joint, pain with overhead work or sleeping on the shoulder. The exam showed full ROM of the shoulder, pain to palpation of the AC joint, pain with overhead motion of the right arm, and pain was increased with cross body adduction of the right arm. X-rays showed persistent spurring about the AC joint. The VA diagnosis was distal clavicle fracture with acromioclavicular arthritis s/p surgery times two with persistent degenerative symptoms.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition of painful motion-right shoulder, 5099-5003, at 0%. The PEB stated “Rated for pain, moderate/intermittent. The VA rated the shoulder as 5203 (Clavicle or scapula, impairment), at 10%. In April 2011 the VA continued the right shoulder rating at 10%. The Board considered all exams proximate to the date of separation: the treatment record supported painful motion, clavicle impairment, and tenderness to meet the 10% rating criteria of code 5203 (Clavicle or scapula, impairment). Alternatively, application of VASRD §4.59 (Painful motion) and use of codes 5003 or 5010 also provides a 10% rating. Clinically there may have been signs of loose motion, but the record did not provide sufficient objective findings to support a 20% rating under code 5203 for loose movement of the clavicle. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Resolution of reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for clavicle impairment, without loose movement, 5099-5203.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the right shoulder condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that instruction by the Board. In the matter of the painful motion-right shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5203 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE RATING
Painful motion-right shoulder 5099-5203 10%
COMBINED
10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120612, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
’ Affairs Treatment Record




                  xxxxxx
                  President


SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for AR20130001168 (PD201201072)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00850

    Original file (PD2012-00850.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW injections into treatment, nine NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200850 SEPARATION DATE: 20050426 BOARD DATE: 20130116 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (19K/Armor Crewman), medically separated for right shoulder pain. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00056

    Original file (PD2013 00056.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated “chronic right shoulder pain, status post distal clavicle excision, and pain rated as slight, not requiring daily narcotic therapy and frequent” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00131

    Original file (PD2013 00131.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded right shoulder pain s/p arthroscopic subacromial decompression and distal clavicle excision to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also identified and forwarded left ankle pain as medically acceptable.The PEBadjudicated the chronic right shoulder pain as unfitting, rated 0%with specified application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The left ankle pain condition was determined to meet retention standards and thereforewas...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01145

    Original file (PD-2013-01145.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left shoulder instability, leftshoulder superior labral tear and left shoulder acromioclavicular(AC)joint degenerative arthritis were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated chronic pain with instability left shoulder, with superior labral tear, debrided and AC degenerative joint disease as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02154

    Original file (PD-2013-02154.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The shoulder and ankle conditions, characterized as “bilateral shoulder pain and chronic left ankle pain”, were the only two conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. However, although limitation of motion was non-compensable, Board members agreed that sufficient evidence of painful motion (VASRD §4.59) was present to support a 10% rating in each shoulder.There was no history of shoulder dislocations or of humerus malunion to support any rating under the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00447

    Original file (PD-2012-00447.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20020502 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200447 BOARD DATE: 20121214 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E‐4 (88M10/Motor Transport Operator), medically separated for persistent right shoulder pain, status post (s/p) Weaver‐Dunn procedure, with excision of portion of the distal clavicle. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02743

    Original file (PD-2013-02743.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Shoulder Pain (non-dominant)5099-500310%Residuals S/P Left Shoulder Surgeries5201-502410%20061114Other x 2 (Not In Scope)Other x 1 RATING: 10%RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070404(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). The VA rated the left shoulder pain (residuals, status post left shoulder surgeries X3) at 10% coded 5201-5024 (limitation of shoulder motion - tenosynovitis) citing painful...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01540

    Original file (PD-2013-01540.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In 2005 I was only medical boarded and rated 20% for my Right Shoulder. The Board considered that following the two surgeries, the CI had painful limited left shoulder ROM with evidence of posttraumatic arthritis on X-rays. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00336

    Original file (PD2010-00336.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI contends his shoulder condition was improperly rated by the PEB: ‘’USMC rated under code 5399-5003. Shoulder Condition . The MEB NARSUM was 5 months prior to separation and has higher probative value with regard to rating the severity of the CI’s conditions based on proximity in time to separation, however the VA C&P 11 months after separation was reviewed and taken into consideration during Board deliberations as was the VA rating code selection.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00485

    Original file (PD2011-00485.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral shoulder pain condition as unfitting, rated 10%; with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The Board considered the evidence of the service treatment record and MEB examination, as well as the C&P examination at the time of separation. In the matter of the left and right shoulder conditions and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends a change in rating to 10% for the left shoulder condition and 10% for the...